|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
20/03/2024 |
Actualizado : |
18/04/2024 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
SCARLATO, M.; RIEPPI, M.; ALLIAUME, F.; ILLARZE, G.; BAJSA, N.; BERTONI, P.; BIANCHI, F.J.J.A.; ECHEVERRIBORDA, G.; GALVÁN, G.; GARCÍA DE SOUZA, M.; GILSANZ, J.C.; GONZÁLEZ BARRIOS, P.; DIESTE, J.P.; TRASANTE, T.; ROSSING, W.A.H.; DOGLIOTTI, S. |
Afiliación : |
MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, Wageningen 6700 AK, the Netherlands; M. RIEPPI, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; F. ALLIAUME, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; G. ILLARZE, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; N. BAJSA, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay; P. BERTONI, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; F.J.J.A BIANCHI, Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, Wageningen 6700 AK, the Netherlands; G. ECHEVERRIBORDA, Cooperativa Entrebichitos, Uruguay,Camino Juan Carlos Boccone, San Jacinto, Canelones 91600, Uruguay; GUILLERMO GALVÁN, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; M. GARCÍA DE SOUZA, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; JUAN CARLOS GILSANZ MARTINEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; P. GONZÁLEZ BARRIOS, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; J.P. DIESTE, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay; T. TRASANTE, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay; W.A.H. ROSSING, Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, Wageningen 6700 AK, the Netherlands; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Av. Garzón 780, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Towards the development of cover crop - reduced tillage systems without herbicides and synthetic fertilizers in onion cultivation: Promising but challenges remain. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil and Tillage Research. 2024, Volume 240, Article 106061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106061 --- OPEN ACCESS. |
ISSN : |
0167-1987 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.still.2024.106061 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 8 May 2023, Revised 15 February 2024, Accepted 20 February 2024, Available online 6 March 2024, Version of Record 6 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Scarlato, M.; Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Camino Folle km 35.500, CP, Canelones, Progreso, Uruguay; email:mscarlato@fagro.edu.uy -- Document type: Article, Hybrid Gold Open Access. -- Funding: This work was supported by the National Research and Innovation Agency of Uruguay (grant no. POS_EXT_2016_1_134356 and project no. FMV_3_2018_1_148038 ), the National Institute of Agricultural Research of Uruguay , and the HortEco project funded by NWO-WOTRO (contract no. W 08.250.304 ). -- Supplementary material: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S016719872400062X-mmc1.docx |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Cover crops with reduced tillage technology (CC-RT) can foster soil health and functioning, a crucial agroecological principle in any transition strategy to more sustainable agricultural systems. However, CC-RT commonly strongly relies on herbicides and synthetic fertilizers, and vegetable crop yields are variable and often low. We assessed the effects of two tillage systems (RT and conventional tillage) and the application of native effective microorganisms (NEM) on onion crop growth and development, yield, N-status, weed pressure, and soil physico-chemical and biological quality after a summer CC, without using herbicides or synthetic fertilizers. Using a participatory research strategy, we conducted a two-year experiment at an experimental station and a one-year trial on two commercial farms. Onion yields were generally low (between 10 and 16 Mg ha-1) and lower in 2019 than in 2020, and lower in RT than in CT in 2020. The relatively low yields in 2019 and RT were associated with poor crop growth and development and leaf-N concentrations below the critical threshold in the early stages of crop development. Soil bulk density was not limiting crop growth in any treatment. Soil mineral N was lower in 2019 than in 2020 and did not significantly differ between treatments. Soil biological activity was higher in RT than in CT. Although the CC residue soil cover in the early stages of the onion crop in RT was more than 50%, RT had a higher weed pressure than CT, which was reversed later in the growing season. The NEM application did not significantly affect most crop, weed, and soil variables. In conclusion, a reduced tillage system for onions without herbicides and synthetic fertilizers is within reach. However, further research is needed to manage weeds and soil N supply dynamics to make CC-RT feasible for no or low agrochemical input systems. © 2024 The Authors MenosABSTRACT.- Cover crops with reduced tillage technology (CC-RT) can foster soil health and functioning, a crucial agroecological principle in any transition strategy to more sustainable agricultural systems. However, CC-RT commonly strongly relies on herbicides and synthetic fertilizers, and vegetable crop yields are variable and often low. We assessed the effects of two tillage systems (RT and conventional tillage) and the application of native effective microorganisms (NEM) on onion crop growth and development, yield, N-status, weed pressure, and soil physico-chemical and biological quality after a summer CC, without using herbicides or synthetic fertilizers. Using a participatory research strategy, we conducted a two-year experiment at an experimental station and a one-year trial on two commercial farms. Onion yields were generally low (between 10 and 16 Mg ha-1) and lower in 2019 than in 2020, and lower in RT than in CT in 2020. The relatively low yields in 2019 and RT were associated with poor crop growth and development and leaf-N concentrations below the critical threshold in the early stages of crop development. Soil bulk density was not limiting crop growth in any treatment. Soil mineral N was lower in 2019 than in 2020 and did not significantly differ between treatments. Soil biological activity was higher in RT than in CT. Although the CC residue soil cover in the early stages of the onion crop in RT was more than 50%, RT had a higher weed pressure than CT, which w... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Agroecology; Conservation agriculture; Farms; Nitrogen; Participatory research; Weeds. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872400062X/pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03943naa a2200409 a 4500 001 1064504 005 2024-04-18 008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0167-1987 024 7 $a10.1016/j.still.2024.106061$2DOI 100 1 $aSCARLATO, M. 245 $aTowards the development of cover crop - reduced tillage systems without herbicides and synthetic fertilizers in onion cultivation$bPromising but challenges remain.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2024 500 $aArticle history: Received 8 May 2023, Revised 15 February 2024, Accepted 20 February 2024, Available online 6 March 2024, Version of Record 6 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Scarlato, M.; Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Camino Folle km 35.500, CP, Canelones, Progreso, Uruguay; email:mscarlato@fagro.edu.uy -- Document type: Article, Hybrid Gold Open Access. -- Funding: This work was supported by the National Research and Innovation Agency of Uruguay (grant no. POS_EXT_2016_1_134356 and project no. FMV_3_2018_1_148038 ), the National Institute of Agricultural Research of Uruguay , and the HortEco project funded by NWO-WOTRO (contract no. W 08.250.304 ). -- Supplementary material: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S016719872400062X-mmc1.docx 520 $aABSTRACT.- Cover crops with reduced tillage technology (CC-RT) can foster soil health and functioning, a crucial agroecological principle in any transition strategy to more sustainable agricultural systems. However, CC-RT commonly strongly relies on herbicides and synthetic fertilizers, and vegetable crop yields are variable and often low. We assessed the effects of two tillage systems (RT and conventional tillage) and the application of native effective microorganisms (NEM) on onion crop growth and development, yield, N-status, weed pressure, and soil physico-chemical and biological quality after a summer CC, without using herbicides or synthetic fertilizers. Using a participatory research strategy, we conducted a two-year experiment at an experimental station and a one-year trial on two commercial farms. Onion yields were generally low (between 10 and 16 Mg ha-1) and lower in 2019 than in 2020, and lower in RT than in CT in 2020. The relatively low yields in 2019 and RT were associated with poor crop growth and development and leaf-N concentrations below the critical threshold in the early stages of crop development. Soil bulk density was not limiting crop growth in any treatment. Soil mineral N was lower in 2019 than in 2020 and did not significantly differ between treatments. Soil biological activity was higher in RT than in CT. Although the CC residue soil cover in the early stages of the onion crop in RT was more than 50%, RT had a higher weed pressure than CT, which was reversed later in the growing season. The NEM application did not significantly affect most crop, weed, and soil variables. In conclusion, a reduced tillage system for onions without herbicides and synthetic fertilizers is within reach. However, further research is needed to manage weeds and soil N supply dynamics to make CC-RT feasible for no or low agrochemical input systems. © 2024 The Authors 653 $aAgroecology 653 $aConservation agriculture 653 $aFarms 653 $aNitrogen 653 $aParticipatory research 653 $aWeeds 700 1 $aRIEPPI, M. 700 1 $aALLIAUME, F. 700 1 $aILLARZE, G. 700 1 $aBAJSA, N. 700 1 $aBERTONI, P. 700 1 $aBIANCHI, F.J.J.A. 700 1 $aECHEVERRIBORDA, G. 700 1 $aGALVÁN, G. 700 1 $aGARCÍA DE SOUZA, M. 700 1 $aGILSANZ, J.C. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ BARRIOS, P. 700 1 $aDIESTE, J.P. 700 1 $aTRASANTE, T. 700 1 $aROSSING, W.A.H. 700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S. 773 $tSoil and Tillage Research. 2024, Volume 240, Article 106061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106061 --- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
12/10/2015 |
Actualizado : |
02/06/2017 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
CAPURRO, M.C.; RICCETTO, S.; TARLERA, S.; IRISARRI, P.; FERNÁNDEZ, A.; CANTOU, G.; ROEL, A. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA CRISTINA CAPURRO BAZZANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SARA MAGDALENA RICCETTO AGUIRREZABALA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA GUILLERMINA CANTOU MAYOL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Irrigation management and greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguayan rice production systems: abstract. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 60, 2015. |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
En versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 64, 2015. |
Contenido : |
Environmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation
are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or
enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most
relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations
in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted
mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy
fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation.
However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to
assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different
irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of
emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were
compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in
order to identify strategies for further progress in sustainable intensification of Uruguayan rice. Results showed that mean
cumulative CH4 emission values for AWDI were 55% lower than CF30 systems; on the other hand, there were no significant
differences in N2O emission among systems. Significant yield differences were not observed in two of the rice seasons, while
AWDI recorded a significant yield reduction in one of them. Total irrigation water applied and irrigation water productivity did not
showed differences in two of the rice seasons, while CF30 reported a higher amount of water applied and lower water
productivity in one of the seasons. It can be concluded that AWDI could be an option to enhance water productivity and GHG
emission mitigation. However, grain yield can be compromised in AWDI systems. The adoption of these technology is based
on the indispensable assess of an overall tradeoff between the risk of possible yield losses, total water used and GHG
emissions. MenosEnvironmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation
are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or
enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most
relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations
in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted
mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy
fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation.
However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to
assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different
irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of
emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were
compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in
order to id... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EMISIONES DE GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO; ÓXIDO NITROSO. |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; MANEJO DEL AGUA; METANO; RIEGO; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5056/1/Agrociencia-Congreso-CIGR2015-v.19.si.p.64-CAPURRO.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03479nam a2200277 a 4500 001 1053552 005 2017-06-02 008 2015 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aCAPURRO, M.C. 245 $aIrrigation management and greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguayan rice production systems$babstract. 260 $aAgrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 60$c2015 500 $aEn versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 64, 2015. 520 $aEnvironmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation. However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in order to identify strategies for further progress in sustainable intensification of Uruguayan rice. Results showed that mean cumulative CH4 emission values for AWDI were 55% lower than CF30 systems; on the other hand, there were no significant differences in N2O emission among systems. Significant yield differences were not observed in two of the rice seasons, while AWDI recorded a significant yield reduction in one of them. Total irrigation water applied and irrigation water productivity did not showed differences in two of the rice seasons, while CF30 reported a higher amount of water applied and lower water productivity in one of the seasons. It can be concluded that AWDI could be an option to enhance water productivity and GHG emission mitigation. However, grain yield can be compromised in AWDI systems. The adoption of these technology is based on the indispensable assess of an overall tradeoff between the risk of possible yield losses, total water used and GHG emissions. 650 $aARROZ 650 $aMANEJO DEL AGUA 650 $aMETANO 650 $aRIEGO 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aEMISIONES DE GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO 653 $aÓXIDO NITROSO 700 1 $aRICCETTO, S. 700 1 $aTARLERA, S. 700 1 $aIRISARRI, P. 700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, A. 700 1 $aCANTOU, G. 700 1 $aROEL, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|